As a teacher of the 21st century, I understand that objective tests are well suited to test knowledge level learning, as well as higher-order thinking (Truog, 2010). However, objective tests do not measure student performance and do not provide information about student abilities. In the 21st century, students need to be able to do more than answer questions on a test. They need to know how to use their knowledge and skills by thinking critically, applying knowledge to new situations, analyzing information, comprehending new ideas, communicating, collaborating, solving problems, and making decisions (Salpeter, 2003).
Traditional approaches tend to lead to traditional conclusions and outcomes (Truog, 2010). If we want different results it will require different methods of teaching and assessing. To prepare students for the 21st century we must replicate experiences of the real world within our teaching. As common as assessment seems to be today, it is an evolving and challenging topic that needs further revision and improvement to better prepare students with 21st century skills. As Salpeter (2003) mentioned, teachers should move beyond standardized testing as the sole measure of student learning; by balancing traditional tests with classroom assessments to measure the full range of students' skills; and using technology-based assessments to deliver immediate feedback.
How would you rather be assessed?
With traditional assessment or...
References:
ReplyDeleteSalpeter, J. (October 15, 2003). 21st Century Skills: Will Our Students Be Prepared? Retrieved on November 16, 2010 from http://www.techlearning.com/article/13832
Truog, A. (n.d.). Students' reactions to performance-based versus traditional objective assessment. Retrieved on November 16, 2010 from http://faculty.valencia.cc.fl.us/development2/curriculumSecure/assessment/v7n8.html